Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon X5670
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
206c2
Core
Raven Ridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
8.35k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
5.58k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.32k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3k (x1.03)
TOTAL
33.14k
20.26k (x0.61)
Multithread
2200U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
49.72k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
35.19k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
21.88k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
8.6k (x2.84)
TOTAL
64.82k
115.4k (x1.78)
Performance/W
2200U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4