| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon W3520


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
106a5
Core
Raven Ridge
Nehalem-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
73.16k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
7.35k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
4.89k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.9k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.82k (x0.96)
TOTAL
33.14k
17.96k (x0.54)

Multithread

2200U

W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
29.69k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
22.26k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
14.91k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
6.29k (x2.08)
TOTAL
64.82k
73.16k (x1.13)

Performance/W
2200U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4