Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5506
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
106a5
Core
Raven Ridge
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.21k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
2.75k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
1.94k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
0.78k (x0.27)
TOTAL
17.02k
6.68k (x0.39)
Multithread
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
12.25k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
25.55k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
17.1k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
5.01k (x1.77)
TOTAL
42.02k
59.9k (x1.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
4.48k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
2.99k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
1.81k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
0.69k (x0.24)
TOTAL
33.14k
9.97k (x0.3)
Multithread
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
41k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
28.17k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
17.4k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.88k (x1.28)
TOTAL
64.82k
90.45k (x1.4)
Performance/W
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
1131 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4