Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
206d7
Core
Raven Ridge
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
8.76k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
7.35k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.86k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.32k (x1.02)
TOTAL
39.03k
23.28k (x0.6)
Multithread
2200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
78.51k (x4.08)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
66.46k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
36.42k (x3.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.88k (x1.26)
TOTAL
68.8k
185.26k (x2.69)
Performance/W
2200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4