Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306e4
Core
Raven Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
551.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
11.96k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
10.73k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.59k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.31k (x1.47)
TOTAL
33.14k
31.6k (x0.95)
Multithread
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
218.24k (x10.65)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
206.92k (x6.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
100.37k (x10.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
11.45k (x3.78)
TOTAL
64.82k
536.99k (x8.28)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
10.55k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
10.02k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.99k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.66k (x1.13)
TOTAL
39.03k
28.23k (x0.72)
Multithread
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
215.04k (x11.17)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
230.43k (x6.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
96.87k (x9.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.76k (x2.85)
TOTAL
68.8k
551.1k (x8.01)
Performance/W
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4