| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
9.96k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.26k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.27k (x1.46)
TOTAL
17.02k
21.94k (x1.29)

Multithread

2200U

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
14.01k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
37.68k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
17.05k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
7.35k (x2.6)
TOTAL
42.02k
76.09k (x1.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
19.17k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
10.55k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.79k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.65k (x1.2)
TOTAL
36.77k
39.16k (x1.07)

Multithread

2200U

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
73.13k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
42.06k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
18.03k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
7.54k (x2.28)
TOTAL
71.02k
140.76k (x1.98)

Performance/W
2200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4