| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.34k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
9.51k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
3.05k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.59k (x0.88)
TOTAL
17.02k
17.49k (x1.03)

Multithread

2200U

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
4.71k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
21.73k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
7.35k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
2.43k (x0.86)
TOTAL
42.02k
36.22k (x0.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
8.29k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
11.82k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.09k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.18k (x1.43)
TOTAL
33.14k
27.39k (x0.83)

Multithread

2200U

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
17.24k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
27.4k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
7.44k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.31k (x1.42)
TOTAL
64.82k
56.39k (x0.87)

Performance/W
2200U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4