Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.1 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.1 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
6fb
Core
Raven Ridge
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
2.78k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
2.49k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.37k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
1.29k (x0.44)
TOTAL
33.14k
8.92k (x0.27)
Multithread
2200U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
10.9k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
9.79k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
9.11k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
0.84k (x0.28)
TOTAL
64.82k
30.64k (x0.47)
Performance/W
2200U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4