Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-9700K
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 6.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 6.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
29.3k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
25.61k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.86k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
12.86k (x3.31)
TOTAL
36.77k
73.62k (x2)
Multithread
2200U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
217.77k (x10.83)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
190.46k (x5.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
40.48k (x3.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
11.31k (x3.42)
TOTAL
71.02k
460.02k (x6.48)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4