Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-7660U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
132.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.46k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
19.29k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.77k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
10.94k (x2.81)
TOTAL
36.77k
57.46k (x1.56)
Multithread
2200U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
56.67k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
46.95k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
12.36k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
16.84k (x5.09)
TOTAL
71.02k
132.81k (x1.87)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
8854 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4