Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
406f1
Core
Raven Ridge
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
23.11k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
17.84k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.34k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.47k (x0.89)
TOTAL
36.77k
49.76k (x1.35)
Multithread
2200U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
184.19k (x9.16)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
181.2k (x4.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
47.44k (x4.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
14.69k (x4.44)
TOTAL
71.02k
427.51k (x6.02)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4