| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-6560U


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6560U is 1.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
406e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
107.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.29k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
13.52k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.24k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
7.08k (x2.42)
TOTAL
17.02k
28.14k (x1.65)

Multithread

2200U

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
6.49k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
31.11k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
10.25k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
6.16k (x2.18)
TOTAL
42.02k
54.01k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.21k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
19.25k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.41k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
7.09k (x1.82)
TOTAL
36.77k
52.96k (x1.44)

Multithread

2200U

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
44.94k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
44.98k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
10.83k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.26k (x1.89)
TOTAL
71.02k
107.01k (x1.51)

Performance/W
2200U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4