| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-4930K


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4930K is 2.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306e4
Core
Raven Ridge
Ivy Bridge-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
32.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
12k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
11.35k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.53k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
4.35k (x1.34)
TOTAL
39.03k
32.22k (x0.83)

Multithread

2200U

i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
72.46k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
80.33k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
33.44k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
12.03k (x3.92)
TOTAL
68.8k
198.27k (x2.88)

Performance/W
2200U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
557 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
618 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
2910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
8262 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4