Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-4790K
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
215.47k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
5.06k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
12.63k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
5.81k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.96k (x1.69)
TOTAL
17.02k
28.47k (x1.67)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
18.28k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
64.07k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
27.52k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
7.97k (x2.82)
TOTAL
42.02k
117.84k (x2.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
15.6k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
13.92k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
6.12k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
5k (x1.71)
TOTAL
33.14k
40.65k (x1.23)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
65.48k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
63.29k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
27.93k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
7.84k (x2.59)
TOTAL
64.82k
164.54k (x2.54)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
15.8k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
14.35k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.97k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
5.17k (x1.59)
TOTAL
39.03k
41.29k (x1.06)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
62.79k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
66.48k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
26.35k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.74k (x2.84)
TOTAL
68.8k
164.36k (x2.39)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
26.16k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
14.78k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
6.01k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
5.52k (x1.42)
TOTAL
36.77k
52.47k (x1.43)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
107.76k (x5.36)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
70.84k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
27.99k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
8.87k (x2.68)
TOTAL
71.02k
215.47k (x3.03)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
805 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
318 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2448 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5946 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3359 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4