| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-4765T


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
134.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
15.61k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
8.8k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.58k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.33k (x0.86)
TOTAL
36.77k
31.31k (x0.85)

Multithread

2200U

i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
66k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
43.27k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
17.39k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
7.88k (x2.38)
TOTAL
71.02k
134.53k (x1.89)

Performance/W
2200U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3844 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4