| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
8.53k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
3.99k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.51k (x1.2)
TOTAL
17.02k
19.47k (x1.14)

Multithread

2200U

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
11.93k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
42.4k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
18k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.6k (x1.27)
TOTAL
42.02k
75.92k (x1.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
18.98k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
9.5k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.32k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.99k (x1.03)
TOTAL
36.77k
36.8k (x1)

Multithread

2200U

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
74.75k (x3.72)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
47.72k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
19.65k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.02k (x0.91)
TOTAL
71.02k
145.15k (x2.04)

Performance/W
2200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4