| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-3770


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306a9
Core
Raven Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
133.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
12.55k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
12.11k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
5.25k (x1.62)
TOTAL
39.03k
34.59k (x0.89)

Multithread

2200U

i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
49.56k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
56.21k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
22.17k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
5.75k (x1.87)
TOTAL
68.8k
133.7k (x1.94)

Performance/W
2200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
1736 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4