Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
190.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
4.91k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
20.01k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
6.05k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
14.16k (x4.84)
TOTAL
17.02k
45.13k (x2.65)
Multithread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
13.79k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
70.21k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
20.05k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
8.04k (x2.84)
TOTAL
42.02k
112.09k (x2.67)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
17.66k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
25.46k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
6.4k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
14.05k (x4.8)
TOTAL
33.14k
63.57k (x1.92)
Multithread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
54.45k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
84.97k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
21.26k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
8.04k (x2.65)
TOTAL
64.82k
168.72k (x2.6)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
17.52k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
26.74k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
6.22k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
13.33k (x4.1)
TOTAL
39.03k
63.81k (x1.63)
Multithread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
54.53k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
85.61k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
20.87k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.05k (x2.62)
TOTAL
68.8k
169.07k (x2.46)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.85k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
21.15k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.78k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
10.24k (x2.63)
TOTAL
36.77k
59.01k (x1.61)
Multithread
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
86.08k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
79.78k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
18.26k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.69k (x2.02)
TOTAL
71.02k
190.82k (x2.69)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4