Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-9500T
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ea
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
274.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.73k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
15.41k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.62k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
10.59k (x3.62)
TOTAL
17.02k
34.35k (x2.02)
Multithread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
20.82k (x3.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
85.48k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
23.21k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
4.11k (x1.45)
TOTAL
42.02k
133.63k (x3.18)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
12.4k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
18.41k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.69k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
10.48k (x3.58)
TOTAL
33.14k
45.98k (x1.39)
Multithread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
74.86k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
105.88k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
22.34k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.01k (x1.32)
TOTAL
64.82k
207.08k (x3.19)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
13.46k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
20.21k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.72k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
10.25k (x3.15)
TOTAL
39.03k
48.64k (x1.25)
Multithread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
74.65k (x3.88)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
110.86k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
22.08k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
4.12k (x1.34)
TOTAL
68.8k
211.7k (x3.08)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
24.5k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
21.41k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.82k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
10.73k (x2.76)
TOTAL
36.77k
61.46k (x1.67)
Multithread
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
134.63k (x6.7)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
113.61k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
21.71k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
4.07k (x1.23)
TOTAL
71.02k
274.02k (x3.86)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
7829 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4