| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 2.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
806eb
Core
Raven Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
149.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
24.32k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
20.35k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.38k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
8.52k (x2.19)
TOTAL
36.77k
57.57k (x1.57)

Multithread

2200U

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
65.17k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
63.6k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
14.4k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.31k (x1.91)
TOTAL
71.02k
149.48k (x2.1)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
9965 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4