Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-7400T
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
49.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
163.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
19.7k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
17.29k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.07k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
8.1k (x2.08)
TOTAL
36.77k
49.16k (x1.34)
Multithread
2200U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
75.27k (x3.74)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
66.24k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
13.93k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
7.95k (x2.41)
TOTAL
71.02k
163.4k (x2.3)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2151 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1893 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
398 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
4669 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5764 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2700 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
16388 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4