Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-7400
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
173.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
12.72k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
19.3k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.76k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
8.73k (x2.69)
TOTAL
39.03k
45.52k (x1.17)
Multithread
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
47.95k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
71.98k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
17.22k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.03k (x2.61)
TOTAL
68.8k
145.18k (x2.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.37k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
19.46k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.44k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
6.41k (x1.65)
TOTAL
36.77k
52.69k (x1.43)
Multithread
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
79.57k (x3.96)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
71.41k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
16.44k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.27k (x1.9)
TOTAL
71.02k
173.7k (x2.45)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2672 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4