| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-4590


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4590 is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
40.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
139.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
20.88k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
11.12k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.75k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.19k (x1.08)
TOTAL
36.77k
40.93k (x1.11)

Multithread

2200U

i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
75.76k (x3.77)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
40.42k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
16.97k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.84k (x2.07)
TOTAL
71.02k
139.99k (x1.97)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
902 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
481 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1667 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3006 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11063 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4