Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-4440
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-4440 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4440 is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4440 is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
138.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.71k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
9.23k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.28k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.8k (x1.3)
TOTAL
17.02k
21.02k (x1.23)
Multithread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
13.33k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
34.2k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
15.91k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
6.56k (x2.32)
TOTAL
42.02k
70k (x1.67)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
11.43k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
10.13k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.53k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.93k (x1.34)
TOTAL
33.14k
30.01k (x0.91)
Multithread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
43.67k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
38.78k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
17.03k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
7.72k (x2.55)
TOTAL
64.82k
107.2k (x1.65)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
11.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
10.36k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.45k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.8k (x1.17)
TOTAL
39.03k
30.17k (x0.77)
Multithread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
44.07k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
41.07k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
16.89k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
7.33k (x2.38)
TOTAL
68.8k
109.35k (x1.59)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
19.08k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
10.47k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.53k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.21k (x1.08)
TOTAL
36.77k
38.29k (x1.04)
Multithread
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
73.26k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
41.01k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
17.12k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
7.3k (x2.21)
TOTAL
71.02k
138.69k (x1.95)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
872 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
488 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1651 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11604 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4