| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-4300U


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-4300U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4300U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
40651
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
32.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
64.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
16.54k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
8.71k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.69k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.24k (x0.83)
TOTAL
36.77k
32.18k (x0.88)

Multithread

2200U

i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
31.64k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
21.59k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
8.46k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.09k (x0.93)
TOTAL
71.02k
64.79k (x0.91)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1439 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
564 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
4319 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1116 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11097 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4