| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-2500K


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 1.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
206a7
Core
Raven Ridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
111.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
11.84k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
10.43k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.22k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
5.36k (x1.65)
TOTAL
39.03k
32.85k (x0.84)

Multithread

2200U

i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
45.51k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
40.83k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
20.7k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
4.79k (x1.56)
TOTAL
68.8k
111.83k (x1.63)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
1177 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4