| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-2320


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
206a7
Core
Raven Ridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
66.48k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
8.88k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
7.84k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.79k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.51k (x1.08)
TOTAL
39.03k
24.01k (x0.62)

Multithread

2200U

i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
27.98k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
24.48k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
11.42k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.6k (x0.85)
TOTAL
68.8k
66.48k (x0.97)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
700 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4