Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 3.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 3.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a0652
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
15.65k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
23.13k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.66k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
11.43k (x3.52)
TOTAL
39.03k
55.87k (x1.43)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
26.77k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
43.81k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
10.17k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
11.91k (x3.88)
TOTAL
68.8k
92.66k (x1.35)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
27.14k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
24.75k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.73k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
11.84k (x3.05)
TOTAL
36.77k
69.47k (x1.89)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
105.77k (x5.26)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
107.47k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
24.82k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
8.02k (x2.43)
TOTAL
71.02k
246.07k (x3.46)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4