Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-7130U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
90.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.77k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
11.25k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
3.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.22k (x1.44)
TOTAL
17.02k
21.84k (x1.28)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
5.42k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
25.28k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
8.31k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.6k (x1.27)
TOTAL
42.02k
42.62k (x1.01)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
9.94k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
14.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.77k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.04k (x1.38)
TOTAL
33.14k
32.11k (x0.97)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
20.39k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
32.49k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
8.58k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.63k (x1.2)
TOTAL
64.82k
65.09k (x1)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
9.99k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
15.18k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.67k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
4.09k (x1.26)
TOTAL
39.03k
32.94k (x0.84)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
20.69k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
34.96k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
8.75k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.73k (x1.21)
TOTAL
68.8k
68.13k (x0.99)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
17.82k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
16.18k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.76k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.24k (x1.09)
TOTAL
36.77k
42k (x1.14)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
40.25k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
37.4k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
9.07k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
4.17k (x1.26)
TOTAL
71.02k
90.89k (x1.28)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
6059 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4