Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
79.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.41k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
9.77k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
3.13k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.55k (x1.21)
TOTAL
17.02k
18.86k (x1.11)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
5k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
21.48k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
7.39k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.18k (x1.12)
TOTAL
42.02k
37.05k (x0.88)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
8.66k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
12.31k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.28k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.92k (x1.34)
TOTAL
33.14k
28.16k (x0.85)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
17.87k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
28.59k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
7.68k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.15k (x1.04)
TOTAL
64.82k
57.28k (x0.88)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
8.76k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
13.49k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.21k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.9k (x1.2)
TOTAL
39.03k
29.36k (x0.75)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
18.33k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
31.08k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
7.5k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.61k (x1.17)
TOTAL
68.8k
60.52k (x0.88)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
13.46k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
13.45k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.08k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.4k (x0.87)
TOTAL
36.77k
33.38k (x0.91)
Multithread
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
34.95k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
33.53k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
7.74k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.38k (x1.02)
TOTAL
71.02k
79.6k (x1.12)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
5307 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4