Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
506e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.81k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
15.65k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
5.14k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.28k (x1.46)
TOTAL
17.02k
28.89k (x1.7)
Multithread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
7.75k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
37.33k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
12.13k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.56k (x1.26)
TOTAL
42.02k
60.77k (x1.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
13.76k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
19.96k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
5.44k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.4k (x1.5)
TOTAL
33.14k
43.55k (x1.31)
Multithread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
28.99k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
45.75k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
12.72k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.68k (x1.21)
TOTAL
64.82k
91.14k (x1.41)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
13.78k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
21.21k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.2k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.73k (x1.15)
TOTAL
39.03k
43.92k (x1.13)
Multithread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
29.02k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
49.55k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
12.3k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.28k (x1.07)
TOTAL
68.8k
94.15k (x1.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.89k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
21.04k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.9k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.01k (x1.03)
TOTAL
36.77k
52.84k (x1.44)
Multithread
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
50.05k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
47.13k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
11.38k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.72k (x1.12)
TOTAL
71.02k
112.28k (x1.58)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4