| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-5005U


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-5005U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306d4
Core
Raven Ridge
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
54.99k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
6.24k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
8.82k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.38k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
2.4k (x0.74)
TOTAL
39.03k
19.84k (x0.51)

Multithread

2200U

i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
12.33k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
25.82k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
6.56k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.18k (x1.04)
TOTAL
68.8k
47.89k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
11.08k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
9.5k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.51k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
2.52k (x0.65)
TOTAL
36.77k
25.61k (x0.7)

Multithread

2200U

i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
23.11k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
22.79k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
6.06k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.03k (x0.92)
TOTAL
71.02k
54.99k (x0.77)

Performance/W
2200U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12804 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4