Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
40651
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
46.09k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.14k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
5.4k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
2.37k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.01k (x0.69)
TOTAL
17.02k
11.93k (x0.7)
Multithread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
3.94k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
13.68k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
5.78k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
2.44k (x0.86)
TOTAL
42.02k
25.84k (x0.61)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
6.7k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
5.99k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.65k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.13k (x0.73)
TOTAL
33.14k
17.47k (x0.53)
Multithread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
14.3k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
13.83k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
6.12k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.48k (x0.82)
TOTAL
64.82k
36.74k (x0.57)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
6.4k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
6.2k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.5k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
2.05k (x0.63)
TOTAL
39.03k
17.15k (x0.44)
Multithread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
12.86k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
15.12k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
5.76k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.15k (x0.7)
TOTAL
68.8k
35.88k (x0.52)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
10.69k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
6.16k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.49k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
2.23k (x0.57)
TOTAL
36.77k
21.57k (x0.59)
Multithread
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
21.84k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
15.86k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
5.94k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
2.45k (x0.74)
TOTAL
71.02k
46.09k (x0.65)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3073 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4