Ryzen 3 2200U vs Celeron N4100
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.6 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.6 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
706a1
Core
Raven Ridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
4.72k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
6.99k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.69k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.81k (x0.96)
TOTAL
33.14k
17.21k (x0.52)
Multithread
2200U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
12.54k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
17.99k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
6.71k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.33k (x1.1)
TOTAL
64.82k
40.57k (x0.63)
Performance/W
2200U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4