Ryzen 3 2200U vs Celeron N3150
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
406c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
31.8k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.07k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
1.74k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
1.5k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
1.46k (x0.5)
TOTAL
17.02k
5.78k (x0.34)
Multithread
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
3.99k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
6.31k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
5.05k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
2.65k (x0.94)
TOTAL
42.02k
18k (x0.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
3.91k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
2.29k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
1.57k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
1.44k (x0.49)
TOTAL
33.14k
9.21k (x0.28)
Multithread
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
14.78k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
8.62k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.84k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.57k (x0.85)
TOTAL
64.82k
31.8k (x0.49)
Performance/W
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4