| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
Both models 2200U and 1700X are based on Zen architecture.

Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 5.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f11
Core
Raven Ridge
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
12.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
22.92k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.45k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
14.72k (x4.53)
TOTAL
39.03k
55.59k (x1.42)

Multithread

2200U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
92.51k (x4.81)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
144.76k (x3.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
54.43k (x5.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
22.08k (x7.19)
TOTAL
68.8k
313.78k (x4.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
13.72k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
22.48k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.12k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
15.44k (x3.97)
TOTAL
36.77k
56.76k (x1.54)

Multithread

2200U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
110.92k (x5.52)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
200.56k (x5.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
54.24k (x5.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
7.01k (x2.12)
TOTAL
71.02k
372.73k (x5.25)

Performance/W
2200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4