Ryzen 3 2200U vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
140.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.24k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
13.16k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.41k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.32k (x1.13)
TOTAL
17.02k
24.12k (x1.42)
Multithread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
12.95k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
57.84k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
21.05k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.51k (x1.24)
TOTAL
42.02k
95.36k (x2.27)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
11.98k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
15.85k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.53k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.29k (x1.12)
TOTAL
33.14k
35.65k (x1.08)
Multithread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
48.28k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
74.19k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
23.29k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.47k (x1.14)
TOTAL
64.82k
149.23k (x2.3)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
11.1k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
18.97k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.9k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.39k (x1.04)
TOTAL
39.03k
37.37k (x0.96)
Multithread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
45.74k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
75.47k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
21.89k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.49k (x1.14)
TOTAL
68.8k
146.6k (x2.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
10.88k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
18.09k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.29k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.36k (x0.86)
TOTAL
36.77k
36.64k (x1)
Multithread
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
42.44k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
73.82k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
20.76k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.96k (x1.2)
TOTAL
71.02k
140.97k (x1.98)
Performance/W
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4