| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
Both models 2200U and 2400G are based on Zen architecture.

Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f10
Core
Raven Ridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.8k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
17.38k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
5.17k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.16k (x1.08)
TOTAL
17.02k
29.52k (x1.73)

Multithread

2200U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
15.28k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
76.44k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
27.48k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.02k (x1.07)
TOTAL
42.02k
122.2k (x2.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
13.95k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
20.7k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
5.33k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.03k (x1.03)
TOTAL
33.14k
43.01k (x1.3)

Multithread

2200U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
58.56k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
92.95k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
28.55k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.98k (x0.98)
TOTAL
64.82k
183.04k (x2.82)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
13.04k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
22.35k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.37k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.4k (x1.05)
TOTAL
39.03k
44.15k (x1.13)

Multithread

2200U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
56.49k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
100.74k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
28.21k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.04k (x0.99)
TOTAL
68.8k
188.49k (x2.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
14.2k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
23.23k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.35k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
5.18k (x1.33)
TOTAL
36.77k
47.96k (x1.3)

Multithread

2200U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
58.24k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
105.72k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
28.73k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
5.59k (x1.69)
TOTAL
71.02k
198.27k (x2.79)

Performance/W
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4