Ryzen 3 2200U vs 3350U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
13.25k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
21.67k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.79k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.98k (x1.02)
TOTAL
36.77k
43.7k (x1.19)
Multithread
2200U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
46.47k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
78.38k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
16.69k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.3k (x1)
TOTAL
71.02k
144.84k (x2.04)
Performance/W
2200U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4