Ryzen 3 2200U vs 1200
Description
Both models 2200U and 1200 are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1200 is 1.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f11
Core
Raven Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
11.73k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
18.85k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.22k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
2.76k (x0.71)
TOTAL
36.77k
37.55k (x1.02)
Multithread
2200U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
38.56k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
62.21k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
13.7k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.33k (x1.01)
TOTAL
71.02k
117.81k (x1.66)
Performance/W
2200U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4