| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
100fa0
Core
Raven Ridge
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.98k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
4.57k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
2.57k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.51k (x1.2)
TOTAL
17.02k
12.64k (x0.74)

Multithread

2200U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
11.86k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
27.4k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
15.39k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
3.46k (x1.22)
TOTAL
42.02k
58.11k (x1.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
5.17k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
5.33k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.76k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.51k (x1.2)
TOTAL
33.14k
16.77k (x0.51)

Multithread

2200U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
29.82k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
30.79k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
15.88k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.69k (x1.22)
TOTAL
64.82k
80.19k (x1.24)

Performance/W
2200U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4