Ryzen 3 2200U vs FX 8320
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
600f20
Core
Raven Ridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
103.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
5.35k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
5.14k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.15k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
4.04k (x1.24)
TOTAL
39.03k
16.68k (x0.43)
Multithread
2200U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
36.79k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
40.2k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
19.57k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
6.66k (x2.17)
TOTAL
68.8k
103.21k (x1.5)
Performance/W
2200U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
826 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4