| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Athlon X4 950


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 950 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
660f51
Core
Raven Ridge
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
99.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
12.44k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
15.96k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.54k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3k (x0.77)
TOTAL
36.77k
34.93k (x0.95)

Multithread

2200U

950
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
40.75k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
42.07k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
12.53k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
4.45k (x1.35)
TOTAL
71.02k
99.8k (x1.41)

Performance/W
2200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1535 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4