| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 5.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
90675
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
7.43k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
18.64k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
13.15k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
14.82k (x5.06)
TOTAL
17.02k
54.04k (x3.17)

Multithread

2200U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
36.23k (x6.28)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
134.76k (x5.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
84.06k (x9.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
16.71k (x5.91)
TOTAL
42.02k
271.76k (x6.47)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
24.18k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
23.85k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
14.42k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
14.87k (x5.08)
TOTAL
33.14k
77.32k (x2.33)

Multithread

2200U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
122.98k (x6)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
168.77k (x5.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
96.11k (x9.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
16.32k (x5.39)
TOTAL
64.82k
404.19k (x6.24)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
24.24k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
24.74k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
13.95k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
14.47k (x4.45)
TOTAL
39.03k
77.41k (x1.98)

Multithread

2200U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
126.87k (x6.59)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
186.48k (x5.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
92.37k (x9.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
15.45k (x5.03)
TOTAL
68.8k
421.18k (x6.12)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
33.85k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
20.33k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
10.51k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
11.77k (x3.03)
TOTAL
36.77k
76.46k (x2.08)

Multithread

2200U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
174.21k (x8.66)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
141.31k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
64.86k (x6.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
19.01k (x5.75)
TOTAL
71.02k
399.39k (x5.62)

Performance/W
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4