Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
25.83k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
23.56k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.2k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
5.06k (x1.3)
TOTAL
36.77k
63.64k (x1.73)
Multithread
2200U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
116.87k (x5.81)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
121.08k (x3.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
41.8k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6k (x1.82)
TOTAL
71.02k
285.75k (x4.02)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4