| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.4 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
50657
Core
Raven Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
February 2018
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
216.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
12.92k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
2.54k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
5.09k (x1.43)
TOTAL
44.87k
31.52k (x0.7)

Multithread

2200G

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
103.33k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
87.67k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
20.1k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
4.91k (x1.53)
TOTAL
157.54k
216.02k (x1.37)

Performance/W
2200G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4