Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.9 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.9 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
50657
Core
Raven Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
February 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
29.53k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
22.59k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.99k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
10.22k (x2.88)
TOTAL
44.87k
68.33k (x1.52)
Multithread
2200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
587.06k (x11.51)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
496.41k (x5.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
134.66k (x7.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
22.99k (x7.19)
TOTAL
157.54k
1241.12k (x7.88)
Performance/W
2200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4