Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ed
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
276.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
25.22k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
21.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.02k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
10.71k (x3.02)
TOTAL
44.87k
62.92k (x1.4)
Multithread
2200G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
125.56k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
115.86k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
25.63k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
9.4k (x2.94)
TOTAL
157.54k
276.46k (x1.75)
Performance/W
2200G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4