| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
65 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
145.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
18.98k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
9.5k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.32k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.99k (x1.13)
TOTAL
44.87k
36.8k (x0.82)

Multithread

2200G

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
74.75k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
47.72k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
19.65k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.02k (x0.95)
TOTAL
157.54k
145.15k (x0.92)

Performance/W
2200G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4