| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i7-4500U


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.4 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
40651
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
66.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
16.67k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
9k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.75k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.6k (x1.01)
TOTAL
44.87k
33.02k (x0.74)

Multithread

2200G

i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
31.77k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
21.36k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
7.95k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
5.06k (x1.58)
TOTAL
157.54k
66.14k (x0.42)

Performance/W
2200G
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
4410 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4